International “Resc-IA-Sepsis” protocol: a reinforcement learning system for multidisciplinary surgical intervention guided by biomarkers in septic shock and multiorgan failure

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70577/yz315889

Keywords:

sepsis, septic shock, multiorgan failure, reinforcement learning, artificial intelligence, biomarkers, surgical intervention, international protocol

Abstract

Introduction: Septic shock and multiorgan failure represent the most serious complications of sepsis, with mortality ranging from 28% to 50% according to reported series (He et al., 2026). Clinical decision support systems based on artificial intelligence have emerged as promising tools to optimize the management of these critically ill patients (MORE-CLEAR, 2026). Reinforcement learning (RL), in particular, offers a framework for sequential decision-making in dynamic environments such as intensive care units (rECMOmender, 2026). Objective: To describe the international "Resc-IA-Sepsis" protocol, a reinforcement learning system for multidisciplinary surgical intervention guided by biomarkers in septic shock and multiorgan failure. Methodology: Systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (Page et al., 2021). A search was conducted in PubMed, LILACS, SciELO and Cochrane for studies published between 2020 and 2026 on reinforcement learning systems in sepsis, organ failure predictive models, and biomarkers in septic shock. Results: Seven relevant studies documenting the application of RL and machine learning models in sepsis were identified. RL models have demonstrated the ability to optimize therapeutic decisions, with systems such as MORE-CLEAR integrating structured data and clinical notes to improve patient state representation (MORE-CLEAR, 2026). Machine learning-based predictive models have shown AUCs of up to 0.95 for heart failure prediction and 0.93 for liver failure in septic patients (He et al., 2026). The integration of biomarkers such as presepsin and procalcitonin in predictive models has demonstrated additional prognostic value, with an odds ratio of 5.80 for the development of postoperative complications when combining two presepsin-based risk factors (Presepsin Trial, 2026). Conclusion: The "Resc-IA-Sepsis" protocol represents an innovative approach that integrates reinforcement learning, biomarkers, and predictive models to guide multidisciplinary surgical intervention in septic shock and multiorgan failure. Implementation of this system requires prospective validation in multicenter cohorts to establish its safety and effectiveness (Hybrid Sepsis Model, 2026).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bioscore Study. (2026). A novel composite bioscore integrating biomarkers, clinical scores, and comorbidity indices for prognostic stratification in sepsis. Journal of Inflammation Research, 19, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S579172

He, R., Su, N., & Wang, Y. (2026). Early prediction of multiple organ failure for sepsis patients based on machine learning algorithms. Journal of Intensive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/jim4.70025

Hilders, P. A., et al. (2026). Prediction-guided clustering for sepsis phenotyping: A retrospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41849062/

Hybrid Sepsis Model. (2026). Artificial intelligence framework for real-time integration of electronic health records and clinical notes for early prediction and management of sepsis in intensive care units. Discover Artificial Intelligence. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163-026-01820-0

MORE-CLEAR. (2026). Large language model-augmented offline reinforcement learning framework for sepsis management in critical care. npj Digital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02611-8

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pediatr Sepsis RL. (2026). Aligning reinforcement learning with clinical practice for safe decision support in pediatric sepsis. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.20.26358476

Peña Merlano, E., Pascual Barrera, A., Navarro Quiroz, R., & Fernández Gutiérrez, A. (2024). Valoración de dos biomarcadores inmunológicos en sepsis bacteriana y shock séptico. Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-acta-colombiana-cuidado-intensivo-101-articulo-valoracion-dos-biomarcadores-inmunologicos-sepsis-S0122726224000764

Presepsin Trial. (2026). Antibacterial tactics based on presepsin level in thoracic aorta surgery patients. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT06336213. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06336213

rECMOmender. (2026). rECMOmender: Reinforcement learning for decision support in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management. Critical Care Explorations, 8(2), e1369. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001369

Surviving Sepsis Campaign. (2026). Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026. Intensive Care Medicine, 52(5), 863-936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-026-08361-1

Tang, Z., Sun, P., Liang, R., & et al. (2026). Reinforcement learning for treatment decision-making in sepsis: A scoping review. npj Digital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03034-1

Zhong, K., et al. (2026). A reinforcement learning-guided interpretable method for postoperative sepsis prediction with Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion. Frontiers in Big Data, 9, 1811110. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42021790/

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

International “Resc-IA-Sepsis” protocol: a reinforcement learning system for multidisciplinary surgical intervention guided by biomarkers in septic shock and multiorgan failure. (2026). Salud Medicina E Innovación Journal, 4(3), 766-785. https://doi.org/10.70577/yz315889

Similar Articles

1-10 of 67

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)